would like to point to this Supreme Court decision, lawyer Dirk Witteck, director of counseling services in rental assistance eV in the regional court districts of Aschaffenburg and Darmstadt explicitly.
The Supreme Court admits his Judgement From 20.01.2010 Az VIII ZR 50/09 a landlord to any damages that would have wanted this for the tenant because the tenant had breached the lease in default color scheme.
The clause in the lease there is the opinion of the Supreme Court void pursuant to § 307 I 1 BGB!
While the current lease, the tenant can not be forced to a specific color scheme. This would constitute an unreasonable interference with the living conditions of the tenant to the landlord is not entitled to the BGH.
a concomitant possible partial invalidity of the agreement on the color of individual furnishings with the result that the overall decorative arrangement is ineffective.
corresponds This assessment of the recent Supreme Court jurisprudence of the BGH.
lawyer Dirk Witteck, director of counseling services ug . Point
Photo: lawyer Dirk Witt, head of the counseling center Aschaffenburg and Dieburg in rental assistance eV
Photo: lawyer Dirk Witt, head of the counseling center Aschaffenburg and Dieburg in rental assistance eV
tenant assistance eV
counseling Aschaffenburg
adhesive 6-8
63739 Aschaffenburg
Phone: 06021/365816
tenant assistance eV
counseling Dieburg
stock Strasse 49
64807 Phone: 06071/9816816
0 comments:
Post a Comment